- 500+ Experts Online to help you 24x7
- Guaranteed Grade or Get Money Back!
- Rated 4.8/5 Out of 5087 Reviews
Login / Sign up
Login or Sign Up With Your Email to Complete the Order ProcessGet Additional $5 Cashback on Sign Up
Login or Sign Up With Your Email to Complete the Order ProcessGet Additional $5 Cashback on Sign Up
Law is a system which contains rules that will govern a society. The rules govern the the country, the business contracts and agreements and social relationship. There are three legal systems in United Kingdom viz. English law, Scots Law, and Northern Ireland law. There is no single legal system in United Kingdom. The supreme court of UK is the apex court that has highest authority in all criminal and civil cases in England and Wales and Northern Ireland and for all civil cases in Scots law. The Parliament of UK consists of two houses viz. House of Lords and House of Commons (McKendrick, 2014). This report covers, meaning of representation and how it is different from contract, unfair dismissal grounds, duties of the boards of directors and principles governing award of damages in Law of Tort.
In the given case, Monica is a Human Research Manager at Young and Ernst LLP. She is planning to buy a new car for which she visits a local second hand car dealership called Cars R Us. The car salesman, Chandler convinced Monica to buy 2006 Ford Mondeo by quoting the words “this is the best car in the world, if you do not buy it you will be missing out”. Monica relied on Chandler’s expertise and bought the car which broke down after two weeks of purchasing. She now wishes to sue the car dealership (Lumineau and Henderson, 2012).
From the above case, it is cleared that Monica relied on the representation made by Chandler before entering into the contract to buy the car. “Representation” is a statement which present a fact or an intention, that is made during contractual negotiations. The other meaning is, an action that can be transformed into a statement of fact. It is made before entering into a contract. If a false representation has been made and buyer entered into a contract by relying on the representation then such buyer may cancel and claim damages in limited cases, he has suffered from such false representation. It is necessary to know the difference between a representation and a contractual term for the remedies available in both the cases. On the other hand, a contractual term is a term that governs the rights or obligations of another. A contractual term has legal binding. If a representation is a term of the contract, then party may claim the damages and also have a right to terminate the performance of the contract. The difference between these two are judged on the basis of various factors such as expertise or knowledge of the parties, language used etc. The ultimate criteria to decide on whether statement is a term or a representation lies on the context in which it was made.
In the case of Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams , a second hand Morris car was purchased by Mrs. Williams on the basis that it was a 1948 model as mentioned in registration certificate of the car. The following year, her son used the car as a trade in for a brand new Hillman Minx which he was purchasing from Oscar Chess. The son mentioned the Morris a 1948 model and on that Oscar Chess offered £290 off on the purchase price of Hillman Minx. The Williams could not have had made this purchase without the discount. After 8 months, Oscar Chess found out that the car was a 1939 model and worth much less than thought. Oscar Chess filed for breach of contract arguing that the date of the vehicle was a fundamental term of contract. Hence, giving the grounds to revoke the contract and claim damages.
Held: The statement regarding the age of the car was not a term but a mere representation. Oscar Chess Ltd. As a car dealer has the greater knowledge and expertise and was in a better position to know the age of the manufacturing date than the Williams (defendant) (Idowu, Capaldi and Gupta, 2013).
By applying the above case in the case of Monica and Chandler, the following facts can be determined by applying the Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams, Monica bought the car by relying on the expertise of Chandler. In this case, after meeting Chandler, the first thing Monica mentioned is that she has very little knowledge about the car and she wanted a reliable car that can get her to work and back each day. Chandler suggested and convinced her to buy 2006 Ford Mondeo. By relying on Chandler's expertise Monica got convinced and bought the car.
It can be held that, Chandler being the car salesman had more knowledge about the 2006 Ford Mondeo as compared to Monica but he provided false representation to Monica. She bought the car on relying the false representation of Chandler. Hence, she has the right to cancel the contract, claim the damages and sue the Cars R Us.
In the given case, Young and Ernst has scheduled a meeting with Monica to discuss two unrelated issues. Other than this, the board is unhappy with the performance of an employee. When an employer terminates the employment contract of his employee and the employer does not have a fair reason to terminate the contract, then such a situation is called unfair dismissal. An employee is protected by law for unfair dismissal. Employer may dismiss an employee for any one or combination of the following reasons, capability- when an employee lied about his health or qualification, conduct- includes theft of the company property, or incidents of abusive or racist behaviours, persistent in unpunctuality etc., breaking the law- if an employee breach civil or criminal law after his working hours or for any other reason (Campbell, 2014).
Unfair dismissal are regulated by Employment Rights Act, 1996 and Equality Act, 2010. According to Employment Rights Act, 1996, an dismissal will be termed unfair of an employee has been dismissed for any of the following grounds:
Employer must follow a proper dismissal procedures. The procedures may in verbal warnings, by serving a notice, written final warnings etc. An employer must try to resolve the problems before dismissing the employee. However, an employer has the right to dismiss the employee immediately without giving any warnings in case of “gross misconduct”. Employee, who has been unfairly dismissed from his work may go to the Employment Tribunal and must prove his arguments which are against the employer (Davidov, Freedland and Countouris, 2013).
In the case of CF Capital Plc v Willoughby:
Willoughby (claimant) wan an employee of CF Capital Plc for 18 years when the banking crisis caused the business to suffer. The claimant was offered to go self employed and will be paid monthly along with a percentage of the sales she made. A meeting on 1st December, 2008 was held by her manager, in which she expressed her interest in such a move, and asked her manager to provide her with more information so that she can make her decision. This information did not made available to her and after 3 weeks, she received a letter from her manager confirming her to move to self employed status from 1st January 2009. The letter contained the words “The termination of your existing employment contract will be effective from 31st December, 2008”. Claimant sought legal advice, which confirmed that letter amounted to termination of her contract. After a communication between the claimant, respondent and their legal advisors, the claimant's manager sought to retrieve the position by saying that he had misunderstood the outcome of the meeting and tried to reassure the claimant that she could continue in employment as before. The claimant resumed her work and position and claimed unfair and wrongful dismissal. The ET found that the claimant had resigned but that overturned by the EAT (CF Capital Plc v Willoughby, 2011) .
EAT held that Tribunal was wrong, hence declared that the claimant was dismissed by the respondent and forwarded the matter to a fresh Employment Tribunal.
Monica works as a human resource manager in Young and Ernst LLP where two new board of directors have been appointed to the board and needs to be brief about their role in the organisation. For this duties must be explained by Monica to these new board members. For appointing a board director there are some rules and regulations as per companies law and also articles of LLP contains provisions that needs to be followed for appointment (Prassl, 2014).
Directors in a company is appointed by its shareholders in general meeting but board of directors can also appoint directors if that is permitted by articles of the company. There are two type of directors working in a company non- executive and executive directors. A non executive directors in a company is appointed by using Letter of Appointment(LOA). LOA consist of the terms and conditions on which director is appointed in Young and Ernst. Executive directors are appointed through a employment contract, as executive director is termed as an employee of the organisation. Director is appointed for a particular term that is decided by company as per law.
Company possess status of separate legal entity and perform its activities through board of directors. As company is an artificial person all the decisions regarding various issues in company is taken through board of directors in meetings. Directors of the company are responsible for strategic and operational decisions of the company. When a new director is appointed in the company in the first meeting after appointment roles and duties are explained to them. In this case Monica will explain both the new directors about their duties which are as follows-
These all duties will be explained by Monica to recently appointed directors in Young and Ernst as manager of human resource. Together with this while performing duties director should also take care that when any decision is taken corporate responsibility is followed. When decision in meeting of directors is taken then it should not be biased and all the records must be maintained by directors. Director should also find weakness in organisational system and relevant steps should be taken to solve these issues.
The word 'Tort' in law means a wrong or injury. Tort is the violation of a right of a person or a breach of duty of another towards him/her. In current situation Monica's brother Ross was driving his car while talking on his mobile phone and looking down at radio list. As a result of this Ross car crashed into a pedestrian, Joey who suffered from a broken leg. Joey admitted that at the time of collision he was walking on the road as repairing is going on pavement. He could have crossed the road through pavement but feeling lazy and decided to walk through the road (Lewis and Morris, 2012).
In tort law, a remedy is paid in the form of monetary compensation is given to the aggrieved party. Damages, in the legal sense, is the sum of money, the low impose for breach of a duty or violation of some rights. Damages are money claimed by or ordered to be paid to a person as compensation for loss and injury. Damages are divided into two categories:
compensatory damages are intended to relieve the injured party for his loss or injury. Actual damage is synonymous to compensatory damages but do not include punitive damages. Punitive damages are assessed in order to punish the defendant for wrong conduct to reform or deter the defendant and others who are engaged in similar conduct. Aim of tort damages is to put the injured back into the position in which he/she was before damage incurred. Damages are awarded based on nature of injury, relation between parties and type of risk, liability of individuals and liability rules. Damages are the most important remedy which is plaintiff and can be availed by tort. Various types of damages are:
Nominal damages- Nominal damages are awarded to an individual in an action where the person has not suffered any substantial injury or loss for which he or she must be compensated. Nominal damages may be recovered by plaintiff who is successful in establishing that he or she has suffered a loss or injury as a result of defendant's wrongful conduct.
Contemptuous damages- Contemptuous damages are awarded when level of harm caused to the claimant is low and court feels that the claimant was wrong to bring a claim. These damages are awarded when the plaintiff has suffered some loss but does not deserve to be fully compensated (Gerner-Beuerle, Paech and Schuster, 2013).
Compensatory damages- These damages are recovered in payment of actual injury. It is the sum awarded in a civil action by a court to indemnify a person for the particular loss or injury. This damage provide a amount to injured person which is necessary to replace loss.
Aggravated damages- Damages awarded by court to reflect the exceptional harm done to a plaintiff of the tort action. When damages is caused due to insult and feelings of plaintiff got injured then compensation is increased for this. Aggravated damages are an award and this is paid for intangible elements such as pain, humiliation, anguish, damage in self confidence and loss of faith.
Punitive damages- Damages that are awarded by court when the court feels that compensatory damages are not sufficient and injured person needs more funds to compensate damage. This damage have no relevance with what is the amount of compensatory damages.
In the given case Joey is injured by Ross and compensatory damages in the Law of Tort will be allowed to him. Amount of compensation will be decided by court as both Joey and Ross was wrong at their part.
Damage may be limited by court up to the amount of loss incurred by the injured person. When loss is intangible then limit of damage is not certain and the amount that is considered by court reasonable will be allowed as damage (Oliphant, 2012).
From the above report it is concluded that when consumer relies on expertise of seller to buy a product and misrepresentation is done then buyer can sue seller for misrepresentations made by seller. When employees are dismissed from organisation because of poor performance or for any other reason then proper notice must be provided to them before dismissal. Directors are working body in a organisation and proper duties must be assigned to them at the time of appointment to manage organisation effectively. A injured person needs to be compensated up to damage incurred and damage can be limited by court on the basis of injury.
Will get back to you within 24 hours